From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-06 18:35:15
"Edward Diener" <eddielee_at_[hidden]> writes:
> You are trying to win debates instead of finding out answers.
Please don't. I could easily make the same assertion about you. I'm
doing neither. I'm trying to illustrate why I have a hard time with
the documentation of this library.
>>>>> In the beginning of the doc it specifies that both are for
>>>>> returning values of reference and const reference respectively,
>>>>> while avoiding the reference to reference problem.
>>> Too cryptic for me. Please explain.
>> These constructs do what you just described above and in fact they
>> work even on compilers without partial specialization.
> How does one work with them in the context of call traits ?
Huh? I'm just saying these members of call_traits are redundant and
not even as portable as the ones in type_traits.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk