From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-06 23:02:53
David Abrahams wrote:
> Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>As I recall, call_traits was intended to work around the "reference to
>>reference" problem for both parameters and return types. This problem
>>has since been solved by cwg #106 (
> Or by boost::add_reference ;-)
Out of interest, when did call_traits came into existence?
Was it prior to type_traits? When was it reviewed? It seems
that we are re-reviewing call_traits again?
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk