Re: [boost] Re: call_traits

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-06 23:02:53

David Abrahams wrote:

> Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_[hidden]> writes:

>>As I recall, call_traits was intended to work around the "reference to
>>reference" problem for both parameters and return types.  This problem
>>has since been solved by cwg #106 (
>>http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#106 ).
> 
> Or by boost::add_reference ;-)

Out of interest, when did call_traits came into existence?
Was it prior to type_traits? When was it reviewed? It seems
that we are re-reviewing call_traits again?

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net