From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-08 06:38:14
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> >>>>> Does it mean I can go and enable proxy in directory_iterator?
>> >>>> Well sure, I think that was always legal.
>> >> I guess I was wrong to say that it was always legal. But it was
>> >> never our intention to outlaw it.
>> > Great.
>> Looks like you never did this?
> No. I've sent a patch to Beman, but he did not comment. Do you have an idea if
> he's available?
He's not; he's recovering (successfully) from an illness. I expect
him back in a month or so.
>> I'm going to try to fix iterator_facade to handle these cases.
We have a bit of a problem since an input iterator can never be an
output iterator due to the requirement that *r++ returns T.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk