[boost] Re: erroneous use of BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT ?

From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-11 04:33:04

On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 08:53:50 -0400, David Abrahams
<dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>Toon Knapen <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> When using BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT, the member still need to be
>> _defined_ in a .cpp file (IIUC 9.4.2 par 4 of the standard), unless
>> the enum-trick is used, right?
>
>Unless you believe the DR which says you don't need to do that.

Do you mean my DR (#454)? BTW, one thing I wanted to ask (slightly
off-topic): who is supposed to provide the new wording that the note
at the end of the DR hints at? Me or someone in the committee?

Thanks.

--
Genny.