From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-11 04:33:04
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 08:53:50 -0400, David Abrahams
>Toon Knapen <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> When using BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT, the member still need to be
>> _defined_ in a .cpp file (IIUC 9.4.2 par 4 of the standard), unless
>> the enum-trick is used, right?
>Unless you believe the DR which says you don't need to do that.
Do you mean my DR (#454)? BTW, one thing I wanted to ask (slightly
off-topic): who is supposed to provide the new wording that the note
at the end of the DR hints at? Me or someone in the committee?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk