From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-12 11:47:08
On Jul 10, 2004, at 10:38 PM, Matt Hurd wrote:
>> I believe the upgradable_read_lock is still a viable solution for a
>> very special situation, but it requires suitable documentation to
>> the programmer in how not to abuse it.
> OK. I buy that, but perhaps as a separate mutex beyound the standared
> shareable (rw). I suspect some platforms will support rw_mutex like
> behaviour natively without the upradeable part.
<nod> Perhaps so.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk