From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-14 03:40:12
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:43:34AM -0500, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> > I have fixed all regresions that I could. No luck with the
> > remaining.
> Could you mark the rest as unusable then, please?
I have marked them yesterday, but the regression tests did not
take the markups into account yet.
> > Major compiler platforms are regression free.
> Do you plan to do anything about CodeWarrior failures
> (http://tinyurl.com/5otjj, http://tinyurl.com/3yv84)?
I would like to, but I don't know how. I have posted a request for help on
the list, there were some hints, but it didn't helped.
I have no access to codewarrior8 and without it, there is no chance, that
I will do anything about the failures before the branch.
I have tested with cwpro9 some time ago, and it worked fine. However we
don't have a test setup for this compiler.
> > Code is stable now. I'm not planing to change anything before
> > release, except when somebody helps me with outstanding regressions.
> If they are not resolved, I'd appreciate if you marked them up along
> the lines of the existing standalone failures markup,
> e.g. http://tinyurl.com/6wxz8.
I have fixed some intel problems with the help of Stefan Slapeta.
But the update is not in the regression tables yet.
Just to verify, markup is done in boost/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml, right?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk