|
Boost : |
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-14 05:15:38
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
> > Speaking of uBLAS, test7 will never be able to pass a regression test,
> > whatever the compiler/platform. Indeed, in order for this test to even
> > compile, the macro BOOST_UBLAS_USE_INTERVAL needs to be defined.
> >
> > The Jamfile defines such a macro in the "exe test7" rule, but this rule
> > doesn't seem to be taken into account when regression testing. So the
> > Jamfile of uBLAS should be fixed, or the testing Jamfiles should be
> > enhanced, or...
>
> FWIW, I'm about to finally move uBLAS tests from status/Jamfile to its
> proper place. I'll take care of this problem along the way.
Done. However, I've added this define only to test7. In theory, it's good to
have a set of common defines to apply for all tests, but existing Jamfile
seem to declare different set of defines, so I have no idea what to do about
it.
- Volodya
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk