From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-15 10:57:04
Pavol Droba <droba_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Now I see, that plain formulation "they provide strong exception guarantee"
> is enough. And that is exactly the point I wanted to get to.
I strongly believe that the language "if an exception is thrown there
are no effects" is better than talking about the strong guarantee,
because eventually you get into variations like these:
> "If an exception is thrown, there are no effects other than those
> of <user-supplied operation>"
> "If an exception is thrown other than by <user-supplied operation>,
> there are no effects"
and the basic language used is the same.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk