[boost] Re: Borland const/partial specialization weirdness?

From: Bo Persson (bop_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-16 17:23:45

"Doug Gregor" <dgregor_at_[hidden]> skrev i meddelandet
news:200407161551.10359.dgregor_at_cs.indiana.edu...
> I'm rather confused over the tuple_test_bench failure in Borland
5.6.4:
>
>
http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/cs-win32_metacomm/developer/output/bin-boost-status-tuple_test_bench-test-borland-5-6-4-debug.html
>
> Borland supports partial specialization, but I seem to remember some
weirdness
> with its handling of cv-qualifiers in partial specializations. Does
anyone
> know if this is the case, or how the weirdness goes?

The problems I have seen with Borland did go away when the <const T>
specialization was put before the <T> specialization in the source. Is
that it?

Bo Persson