From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-20 06:54:15
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:07:38 +0100, John Maddock wrote
> > > However, it doesn't seem like there's too much interest in fixing this
> > > issue. So if no one responds I'll just mark the tests as expected
> > > and move on -- I've already spent more time on this than I should
> > Hmm... that's interesting observation. It appears that at least date_time,
> > program_options and regex (see http://tinyurl.com/5ysxu) are affected by
> > problem and nobody seems to care. I think I'll mark the dll tests as
> > expectedly failing too, if no solution arrives quickly.
> I care, but don't have access to como...
> Could a Jamfile patch solve the problem:
> applied as a requirement in a few places?
> Basically we need someone with como to experiment and tell us all
> what to do...
I got the feeling Aleksey was going to give it a shot, but I'm sure he's busy...
Maybe we should just apply a patch to one of the Jamfiles for date-time or
program options. What would the syntax be to restrict this to win32?
Something like this?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk