From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-20 07:47:29
John Maddock wrote:
>>I've put them here: http://genericprogramming.com/boost
>>- ublas (2)
>>- test (_many_)!!
>>- thread/test_read_write_mutex like on other compilers
>>- date_time/testmicrosec_time_clock -> should be expected???
>>Furthermore some in range and serialization.
> That's not too good, the last release had a 100% pass rate for Intel, this
> one really should as well unless there are some really good reasons...
The read_write_mutex is new, so it's not a true regression from the
previous 100% pass rate. I'm currently working on the scheduling
algorithm to make it pass its unit tests and hopefully deal with
reported deadlocking issues.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk