Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-21 18:16:17

Next message: Batov, Vladimir: "RE: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]"
Previous message: DY, JERRY U \(SBCSI\): "[boost] RE: counting_iterator_test.hpp fails on aC++"
In reply to: Howard Hinnant: "[boost] Re: Lock unification [move]"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]"
Reply: Howard Hinnant: "[boost] Re: Lock unification [move]"

Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_[hidden]> writes:

> <nod> How's:
>
> scoped_lock lk1(m, defer_lock); // not locked
^^^^ ^^^^

Redundant. "deferred" is better.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Batov, Vladimir: "RE: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]"
Previous message: DY, JERRY U \(SBCSI\): "[boost] RE: counting_iterator_test.hpp fails on aC++"
In reply to: Howard Hinnant: "[boost] Re: Lock unification [move]"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]"
Reply: Howard Hinnant: "[boost] Re: Lock unification [move]"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk