RE: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]

From: Batov, Vladimir (Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-21 19:05:41

I second that.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> On Behalf Of David Abrahams
> Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 9:16 AM
> To: boost
> Subject: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]
> 
> Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> > <nod>  How's:
> >
> > scoped_lock lk1(m, defer_lock);  // not locked
>          ^^^^              ^^^^
> 
> Redundant.  "deferred" is better.
> 
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> http://www.boost-consulting.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost