From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 06:59:46
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your comments and patience. There's a new spec up
> I've tried to incorporate those comments I've agreed with, and explain
> my disagreements below. Further discussion would be much appreciated.
Something that I missed the first time: I'd prefer more fine-grained
exceptions. lock_error should be a base class only.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk