Re: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 06:59:46

Howard Hinnant wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your comments and patience.  There's a new spec up
> at:
>
> http://home.twcny.rr.com/hinnant/cpp_extensions/threads.html
>
> I've tried to incorporate those comments I've agreed with, and explain
> my disagreements below.  Further discussion would be much appreciated.

Something that I missed the first time: I'd prefer more fine-grained
exceptions. lock_error should be a base class only.