Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 08:55:28

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 09:45:07AM -0400, Michael Glassford wrote:

> >The tests ran successfully for the same toolset in 1.31.
> >A missing library would result in linker errors.
> I was thinking of Windows, where you can link against a .lib file but
> must have the corresponding .dll file available at runtime. This isn't
> the case with Linux?

No, the value returned to the shell would be 1, I believe.
It certainly wouldn't get signal 11.


"You will find that the state is the kind of organization which,
 though it does big things badly, does small things badly too."
	- John Kenneth Galbraith

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at