From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 08:55:28
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 09:45:07AM -0400, Michael Glassford wrote:
> >The tests ran successfully for the same toolset in 1.31.
> >A missing library would result in linker errors.
> I was thinking of Windows, where you can link against a .lib file but
> must have the corresponding .dll file available at runtime. This isn't
> the case with Linux?
No, the value returned to the shell would be 1, I believe.
It certainly wouldn't get signal 11.
-- "You will find that the state is the kind of organization which, though it does big things badly, does small things badly too." - John Kenneth Galbraith
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk