From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 10:14:48
Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_[hidden]> writes:
> scoped_lock lk1(m, deferred);
> scoped_lock lk2(m, tried);
> <shrug> I disliked "tried" more than I liked "deferred". And I also
> felt that the benefit of symmetry was important to make the interface
> easier to learn.
You only need part-of-speech symmetry. "deferred" is an adjective, so
"non_blocking", "optional", "permeable",... would work find for the
other one, from a grammatical point of view. I don't think "try"
makes a very good adjective, and adding "_lock" to the end of it
doesn't help. So I don't see the symmetry in
"try_lock"/"deferred_lock" other than the suffix :vP
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk