From: Reid Sweatman (drunkardswalk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 17:11:46
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Peter Dimov
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 5:48 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]
> Glen Knowles wrote:
> >> From: Howard Hinnant [mailto:hinnant_at_[hidden]]
> >>> I mostly agree with Bronek Kozicki. Given a movable lock, Eric
> >>> Niebler's
> >>> proposal:
> >>> scoped_lock try_lock( Mutex & m );
> >>> scoped_lock timed_lock( Mutex & m );
> >>> is a better try/timed interface. Heisenberg constructors must die.
> >> Sorry, I don't know what a Heisenberg constructor is.
> > It's a reference to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
> It's an indication that I can't tell Shroedinger's cat from
> Heisenberg's principle. ;-)
Just back a truck over it; that should flatten its wave function nicely.
Hmmmn. Maybe that's where Heinlein's "flat cats" aka "tribbles" found their
genesis; after all, remember the title of his penultimate novel.
My own personal theory, though, is that they generated spontaneously within
the Heisenberg energy/time limits, and at some point, they'll all find nice
Feynmann paths back to Quantum Samsara (think I just came up with a new rock
band...hey, don't laugh; remember Toad the Wet Sprocket?).
Okay, okay, okay...listen: can God create a race condition so complete,
even He can't move the lock? Woaaah, like, heavy, lil' dude!
Reid "I don't think that requires a smiley" Sweatman
--returning to my hot tub in my *real* universe...
The foregoing has not been paid for by the "Mind is a Terrible Thing Society
of Lower Wapping," as they couldn't give a rusty quark for Mr. Mark about
it, and would just like everyone to know that. Thank you.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk