RE: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]

From: Batov, Vladimir (Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 19:16:37

> Batov, Vladimir wrote:
> 
> > How 'bout
> >
> > scoped_lock lk1(m, defer);
> > scoped_lock lk2(m, try);
> >
> 
> "try" is a keyword, last I checked.  ;-)

[Batov, Vladimir] Oh, my goodness. Of course, it is. LOL. Looks like I
have not woken up yet. Then, I guess, I am leaning towards Howard's
original

scoped_lock lk1(m, defer_lock);
scoped_lock lk2(m, try_lock);

Minor repetition issue aside, it looks like the clearest, simplest and
most consistent choice.