Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-22 21:56:22

> There's boost/compatibility/cpp_c_headers/cwctype and
> boost/compatibility/cpp_c_headers/cctype. Can we use those
> instead and be assured of portability? Everyone seems to be
> reinventing workarounds for these nasty little beasts.

I was under impression that we should only use these headers where there are
no native headers with appropriate name. Isn't it true?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at