From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-23 06:13:18
> There's boost/compatibility/cpp_c_headers/cwctype and
> boost/compatibility/cpp_c_headers/cctype. Can we use those
> instead and be assured of portability? Everyone seems to be
> reinventing workarounds for these nasty little beasts.
No those headers will not compile on conforming compilers (Metrowerks and
Borland spring to mind) which really do place definitions in namespace std
to begin with.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk