From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-23 07:32:00
I think it was discussed ages ago on these lists (but can't find the
messages now, probably when Bill was still around) about adding
scoped_unlock classes to complement scoped_lock classes?
Are there still plans to add these? My current use is nothing more than
unlock in the constructor, and lock again in the destructor.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk