From: DY, JERRY U \(SBCSI\) (jd2419_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-23 11:26:35
The only workaround I have is to surround the static assertion with
#if !defined (__HP_aCC)
The assumption is that if "advance" is called, the compiler errors
eventually anyway so this change should be harmless (and lets aC++
compile the code). I had to do the same for "decrement" and
"distance_to" member functions.
Is this workaround okay? I probably should check this in only after 1.32
release in any case.
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of David Abrahams
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:36 AM
Subject: [boost] Re: counting_iterator_test.hpp fails on aC++
"DY, JERRY U \(SBCSI\)" <jd2419_at_[hidden]> writes:
> The problem is that since my_int2 is not a random access iterator,
> iterator_adaptor's member function "advance" would not compile because
> of the static assertion below trying to convert
> random_access_traversal_tag to bidirectional_traversal_tag
It should never be instantiated, because it should never be called.
This is a compiler bug.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk