From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-26 01:14:39
Victor A. Wagner Jr. writes:
> At Sunday 2004-07-25 19:41, you wrote:
> >Victor A. Wagner Jr. writes:
> > > The results at metacomm seem to be somewhat out of date. According to
> > > my logs I've run the tests both yesterday and today.
> >I'm afraid something's wrong with your 'collect-logs' step of the
> >regression procedure. The reports *are* regenerated every two hours, and
> >your uploaded results at ftp://fx.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/
> >have today's timestamp, but the archived XML is dated Fri, 23 Jul:
> ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
> ><test-run source="tarball" runner="RudbekAssociates"
> >timestamp="Fri, 23 Jul 2004 04:07:50 +0000" platform="win32"
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >tag="CVS-HEAD" run-type="full">
> if you look at EVERY OTHER timestamp in the file it's different
Hmm, indeed. Looks like 'regression.py' is at fault here. OK, fixed in the
CVS and the attached revision.
> I have NO idea where that comes from, I've been doing checkouts from
> CVS. I don't even know what a tarball is.
Fixed this one as well (now in your case it should say "CVS").
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk