Re: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-26 09:06:45

From: Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_[hidden]>
> On Jul 25, 2004, at 1:29 PM, Rob Stewart wrote:
> >
> > The good news, in case no one else considered it, is that the
> > precedence of any of the X= operators is very low, so you can
> > take your pick on esthetic grounds alone.
> 
> The bad news is that ~= isn't really available.  ;-)

Doh, I guess I should have double-checked myself on the list of
available operators rather than creating my own!

> Here's the full list to peruse:
> 
> =
> +=
> -=
> *=
> /=
> %=
> ^=
> &=
> |=
> >>=
> <<=

BTW, given the earlier examples using the conditional operator, I
don't think we should consider any other operators (except
<opening can with worms> the comma operator).  (No, I wasn't
serious about the comma operator, I just couldn't resist since it
has lower precedence and there was a recent discussion about it.)

-- 
Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     http://www.sig.com
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;