From: Stefan Slapeta (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-05 10:22:10
David Abrahams wrote:
> Well, in principle the patch is OK, but whatever you're doing that's
> causing that code to be compiled with CW8 is emphatically *NOT* OK.
> At best it represents a deadly ODR trap.
> So I'd rather not see you make any changes to detail/iterator.hpp --
> that part of the code is not meant for conforming compilers.
Sorry, as I thought it was harmless I as I wanted to see the results for
it in the next run, I commited it before I read your mail. Shall I
remove it again?
What I'll do anyway is to disable this workaround test for all compilers
that support partial specialization.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk