Re: [boost] Re: [algo/string] CW8; was... Re: [dynamic_bitset] CW8 regression, a plea for help!

From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-06 14:07:49

On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:09:49AM -0500, Rene Rivera wrote:
> Rene Rivera wrote:
> 
> >Pavol Droba wrote:
> >
> >>BOOST_PP helps me a lot in here, however it is not crusial for the 
> >>library.
> >>So if there is no other way to handle this I can rewrite the file to be
> >>without the preprocessor. 
> >
> >It does help you.. It's saving a lot of typing in this case.
> >
> >>Are you sure, that there is no other way around?
> >
> >I'm about to try a last one... which is to replace the 
> >BOOST_PP_SEQ_ENUM, with some form of BOOST_PP_ARRAY, and possible just a 
> >custom ARGn set of macros.
> 
> OK, figured out a fix, with slightly more typing at each test line, but 
> it eliminates the use of BOOST_PP without eliminating the time saving 
> TEST* macro.
> 
> I checked in the changes, and I'm running a full set of tests now.

Great, I was thinking about a similar approach, just haven't time to 
look at it more deeply.

Anyway, thanks for help.

Regards,

Pavol.