From: Stefan Slapeta (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-10 09:24:58
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> Right now I have given this fix a low priority since I'm focusing on the documentation and more important tests.
> I made the test in the first place to see which compilers that did not choke on it; it might have been a sligh abuse of our
> test setup, but it is the only way to gain access to a lot of compilers.
> So please don't worry too much about this test.
I don't see yet what to fix here: compat2 differs from compat1 _only_ in
the missing 'typename'. [This was also the reason for me to remove this
test during you absence.]
What actually does the information about how compilers treat a missing
'typename' tell you?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk