[boost] Re: Missing typename in range compat2_test

From: Stefan Slapeta (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-10 09:24:58

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>
> Right now I have given this fix a low priority since I'm focusing on the documentation and more important tests.
> I made the test in the first place to see which compilers that did not choke on it; it might have been a sligh abuse of our
> test setup, but it is the only way to gain access to a lot of compilers.
> 
> So please don't worry too much about this test.
> 

I don't see yet what to fix here: compat2 differs from compat1 _only_ in 
the missing 'typename'. [This was also the reason for me to remove this 
test during you absence.]
What actually does the information about how compilers treat a missing 
'typename' tell you?

Stefan