From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-14 05:03:12
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message news:ufz6q4qlr.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
| "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
| > are this all very complicated compared to what we want to
| > achieve. wouldn't it be better just to stick to the using detail::XX
| > trick and then write on the portability page that for best
| > portability, always include new overloads before the range library.
| I don't know what you're suggesting precisely, nor what problem we're
| trying to solve globally, so I can't answer. Maybe if someone could
| synthesize this all into a short description it would be easier.
We want to find an easy way to enable ADL lookup with qualified syntax
and to find an portable implementation of that (perhaps without a using declaration).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk