Re: [boost] Another patch for long long in gcc -std=c++98

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-17 09:43:14

> > As a side effect, it causes errors to be generated when the long long
> > typename is used unadorned.
>
> This isn't strictly true. "long long" will be accepted without any
> diagnostic, even with "-ansi -Wall", it is "-pedantic" that causes it to
> be rejected. I tested this on Linux and FreeBSD, with 2.95 and 3.[0345],
> and the doc links you gave confirm it:

That's right, and if you supply -Wno-long-long as well, then you can compile
with -pedantic -ansi -Wall with no problems.

John.