[boost] [boost.test] Patch for true64cxx65 support.

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-17 10:51:52

Hello,

attached is a patch which makes boost.test work for the beforementioned 
toolset. It contains a workaround for the internal compiler error currently 
preventing any tests from running. Could anyone please apply it, if it's ok?

Thanks, Markus

diff -ru boost-04-08-17-0400/boost/test/detail/basic_cstring/basic_cstring_fwd.hpp boost-cvs/boost/test/detail/basic_cstring/basic_cstring_fwd.hpp
--- boost-04-08-17-0400/boost/test/detail/basic_cstring/basic_cstring_fwd.hpp	2004-07-19 14:28:17.000000000 +0200
+++ boost-cvs/boost/test/detail/basic_cstring/basic_cstring_fwd.hpp	2004-08-17 17:39:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -16,13 +16,21 @@
 #ifndef BASIC_CSTRING_FWD_HPP_071894GER
 #define BASIC_CSTRING_FWD_HPP_071894GER
 
+#include <boost/detail/workaround.hpp>
+
 namespace boost {
 
 namespace unit_test {
 
 template<class CharT> class         basic_cstring;
 typedef basic_cstring<char const>   const_string;
+
+#if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__DECCXX_VER, BOOST_TESTED_AT(60590041))
+typedef const_string                literal_string;
+#else
 typedef const_string const          literal_string;
+#endif
+
 typedef char const* const           c_literal_string;
 
 } // namespace unit_test
diff -ru boost-04-08-17-0400/boost/test/detail/unit_test_parameters.hpp boost-cvs/boost/test/detail/unit_test_parameters.hpp
--- boost-04-08-17-0400/boost/test/detail/unit_test_parameters.hpp	2004-07-19 14:24:32.000000000 +0200
+++ boost-cvs/boost/test/detail/unit_test_parameters.hpp	2004-08-17 17:33:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -25,19 +25,41 @@
 namespace unit_test {
 
 // framework parameters and there corresponding command-line arguments
-literal_string LOG_LEVEL         = "BOOST_TEST_LOG_LEVEL";              // --log_level
-literal_string NO_RESULT_CODE    = "BOOST_TEST_RESULT_CODE";            // --result_code
-literal_string REPORT_LEVEL      = "BOOST_TEST_REPORT_LEVEL";           // --report_level
-literal_string TESTS_TO_RUN      = "BOOST_TESTS_TO_RUN";                // --run_test
-literal_string SAVE_TEST_PATTERN = "BOOST_TEST_SAVE_PATTERN";           // --save_pattern
-literal_string BUILD_INFO        = "BOOST_TEST_BUILD_INFO";             // --build_info
-literal_string CATCH_SYS_ERRORS  = "BOOST_TEST_CATCH_SYSTEM_ERRORS";    // --catch_system_errors
-literal_string REPORT_FORMAT     = "BOOST_TEST_REPORT_FORMAT";          // --report_format
-literal_string LOG_FORMAT        = "BOOST_TEST_LOG_FORMAT";             // --log_format
-literal_string OUTPUT_FORMAT     = "BOOST_TEST_OUTPUT_FORMAT";          // --output_format
-
-enum report_level                     { CONFIRMATION_REPORT, SHORT_REPORT, DETAILED_REPORT, NO_REPORT, UNDEF_REPORT };
-literal_string report_level_names[] = { "confirm"          , "short"     , "detailed"     , "no"     };
+#if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__DECCXX_VER, BOOST_TESTED_AT(60590041))
+// Needed because literal_string must not be const, you get multiple defined
+// symbols otherwise. (see 'basic_cstring_fwd.hpp') As an alternative,
+// 'c_literal_string' could be replaced by 'literal_string const' as well.
+c_literal_string LOG_LEVEL         = "BOOST_TEST_LOG_LEVEL";              // --log_level
+c_literal_string NO_RESULT_CODE    = "BOOST_TEST_RESULT_CODE";            // --result_code
+c_literal_string REPORT_LEVEL      = "BOOST_TEST_REPORT_LEVEL";           // --report_level
+c_literal_string TESTS_TO_RUN      = "BOOST_TESTS_TO_RUN";                // --run_test
+c_literal_string SAVE_TEST_PATTERN = "BOOST_TEST_SAVE_PATTERN";           // --save_pattern
+c_literal_string BUILD_INFO        = "BOOST_TEST_BUILD_INFO";             // --build_info
+c_literal_string CATCH_SYS_ERRORS  = "BOOST_TEST_CATCH_SYSTEM_ERRORS";    // --catch_system_errors
+c_literal_string REPORT_FORMAT     = "BOOST_TEST_REPORT_FORMAT";          // --report_format
+c_literal_string LOG_FORMAT        = "BOOST_TEST_LOG_FORMAT";             // --log_format
+c_literal_string OUTPUT_FORMAT     = "BOOST_TEST_OUTPUT_FORMAT";          // --output_format
+#else
+literal_string   LOG_LEVEL         = "BOOST_TEST_LOG_LEVEL";              // --log_level
+literal_string   NO_RESULT_CODE    = "BOOST_TEST_RESULT_CODE";            // --result_code
+literal_string   REPORT_LEVEL      = "BOOST_TEST_REPORT_LEVEL";           // --report_level
+literal_string   TESTS_TO_RUN      = "BOOST_TESTS_TO_RUN";                // --run_test
+literal_string   SAVE_TEST_PATTERN = "BOOST_TEST_SAVE_PATTERN";           // --save_pattern
+literal_string   BUILD_INFO        = "BOOST_TEST_BUILD_INFO";             // --build_info
+literal_string   CATCH_SYS_ERRORS  = "BOOST_TEST_CATCH_SYSTEM_ERRORS";    // --catch_system_errors
+literal_string   REPORT_FORMAT     = "BOOST_TEST_REPORT_FORMAT";          // --report_format
+literal_string   LOG_FORMAT        = "BOOST_TEST_LOG_FORMAT";             // --log_format
+literal_string   OUTPUT_FORMAT     = "BOOST_TEST_OUTPUT_FORMAT";          // --output_format
+#endif
+
+enum report_level                       { CONFIRMATION_REPORT, SHORT_REPORT, DETAILED_REPORT, NO_REPORT, UNDEF_REPORT };
+
+#if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__DECCXX_VER, BOOST_TESTED_AT(60590041))
+// See comment on workaround above.
+c_literal_string report_level_names[] = { "confirm"          , "short"     , "detailed"     , "no"     };
+#else
+literal_string   report_level_names[] = { "confirm"          , "short"     , "detailed"     , "no"     };
+#endif
 
 enum output_format { HRF /* human readable format */, XML /* XML */ };