From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-18 06:02:04
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> I can do it with this syntax:
The nice thing about the original syntax was that you didn't have to
specify the return type. Is it be possible to change this to something
So that the return type is just a placeholder.
An alternative would be:
But maybe that's a bit too jumbled up.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk