Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-18 06:28:39

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] intrinsice 64 bit integers"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Suggestion for weak_ptr's"
In reply to: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: Intel: different macros for Windows and Linux"
Next in thread: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: Intel: different macros for Windows and Linux"
Reply: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: Intel: different macros for Windows and Linux"

> Small change - Itanium (_WIN64) should be included.
>
> Furthermore, I would like to increase the value for supported compilers
> versions to 810 to make 8.1 beta running.

Jep, please go ahead and commit.

John.

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] intrinsice 64 bit integers"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Suggestion for weak_ptr's"
In reply to: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: Intel: different macros for Windows and Linux"
Next in thread: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: Intel: different macros for Windows and Linux"
Reply: Stefan Slapeta: "[boost] Re: Intel: different macros for Windows and Linux"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk