[boost] Re: lightweight replacement for boost::function

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-18 10:06:47

"John Torjo" <john.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote in message news:4123762F.5060101_at_torjo.com...
| Dear boosters,
|
| Did a lightweight replacement for boost::function (compile-wise). Focus
| was on making it very fast to compile.

Have you tested normal code on a compiler with precompiled headers? I can include seriously
large headers faster than compiling simple code again.

I have long been wanting to use <boost/std.hpp> <boost/boost.hpp>.

Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a portable way to create/use PCH. Or did
bjam already support this?

br

Thorsten