Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Carlo Wood (carlo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-18 15:37:33

Next message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: Re: Overload resolution & boost::bind"
Previous message: Bronek Kozicki: "[boost] boost::noncopyable broken?"
In reply to: Steven E. Harris: "[boost] Re: Shouldn't boost::filesystem be BOOST_POSIX on cygwin?"
Next in thread: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard: "Re: [boost] Re: Shouldn't boost::filesystem be BOOST_POSIX on cygwin?"

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 10:45:51AM -0700, Steven E. Harris wrote:
> I hope you're not considering "C:\cygwin" to be the fixed installation
> point of the Cygwin suite.

Of course not.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo_at_[hidden]>

Next message: Rob Stewart: "Re: [boost] Re: Re: Overload resolution & boost::bind"
Previous message: Bronek Kozicki: "[boost] boost::noncopyable broken?"
In reply to: Steven E. Harris: "[boost] Re: Shouldn't boost::filesystem be BOOST_POSIX on cygwin?"
Next in thread: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard: "Re: [boost] Re: Shouldn't boost::filesystem be BOOST_POSIX on cygwin?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk