From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-22 20:54:04
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > "Alex Chovanec" <achovane_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > > Assuming I'm correct in stating that a utility like
> does not
> > > already exist in Boost, is there any interest in such a utility?
> > Yes, if it's implementable. But I don't think it is.
> Isn't the most fundamental problem that even if you could test for
> the valid expressions you'll never be able to guarantee the
> So there will never be a perfect 'is_iterator'.
Okay, I guess this is a bad argument. Anyone who specializes
iterator_traits for a non-iterator is a liar and deserves what he
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk