From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-27 05:46:00
John Maddock wrote:
> > With all those replies, I was able to diagnose the problem. On a number
> > of toolsets, <runtime-link>dynamic automatically sets <threading>multi.
> > The program_options jamfiles had std::facet-support in requirements,
> > which forces <runtime-link>static on intel. Apparently, the handling of
> > std::facet-support is done after <threading>multi is added, which leads
> > to inconsistency.
> > I'll raise the issue on jamboost@
> BTW isn't the std::facet-support option irrelevant now? It only has any
> effect for Intel (last time I looked), and since Intel have long since
> fixed the bugs that caused us to add that option, can't we just get rid of
Yea, I recall you mentioned that before, that's why I've removed
std::facet-support from Jamfile and is now waiting for next regression tests
run for see if that fixes the problem.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk