Re: [boost] Re: [program_options + test] Intel problem

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-27 05:46:00

John Maddock wrote:

> > With all those replies, I was able to diagnose the problem. On a number
> > of toolsets, <runtime-link>dynamic automatically sets <threading>multi.
> > The program_options jamfiles had std::facet-support in requirements,
> > which forces <runtime-link>static on intel. Apparently, the handling of
> > std::facet-support is done after <threading>multi is added, which leads
> > to inconsistency.
> >
> > I'll raise the issue on jamboost@
>
> BTW isn't the std::facet-support option irrelevant now?  It only has any
> effect for Intel (last time I looked), and since Intel have long since
> fixed the bugs that caused us to add that option, can't we just get rid of
> it?

Yea, I recall you mentioned that before, that's why I've removed 
std::facet-support from Jamfile and is now waiting for next regression tests 
run for see if that fixes the problem.

- Volodya