[boost] Re: patch to kill warnings on boost-cvs

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-27 07:26:57

Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
>
>> diff -ur boost/date_time/date_names_put.hpp /usr/include/boost-1_32/boost/date_time/date_names_put.hpp
>> --- boost/date_time/date_names_put.hpp	2004-07-17 19:20:18.000000000 -0300
>> +++ /usr/include/boost-1_32/boost/date_time/date_names_put.hpp	2004-08-23 17:35:05.000000000 -0300
>> @@ -142,10 +142,10 @@
>>            default: {} //quiet compilers that want all cases covered here (eg: gcc 3.1)
>>          }
>>        }
>> -      virtual void do_put_weekday_short(iter_type& oitr, weekday_enum wd) const
>> +      virtual void do_put_weekday_short(iter_type&, weekday_enum) const
>>        {
>>        }
>> -      virtual void do_put_weekday_long(iter_type& oitr, weekday_enum wd) const
>> +      virtual void do_put_weekday_long(iter_type&, weekday_enum) const
>>        {
>>        }
>>        virtual bool do_has_date_sep_chars() const
>
> Aren't there compiler that require the variable name? 

No, I don't think so.  It's not like this is a new C++ feature -- you
can do it in 'C'.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com