Re: [boost] another bjam question

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-29 23:33:33

Robert Ramey wrote:

> I don't know, but the dmc toolset is broken for the same reason. Actually 
> this seems to me to be a bad design decision: why would the compilers 
> include directory be present on the command line at all?  

It's not by design, it's a bug. It's not supposed to add the includes 
for the compiler, only the STLport includes.

> I traced this to changes made at the beginning of august by Rene Rivera to
> factor out commonalities of stlport toolset. Basically not a bad idea but it
> ended up with this error.

Does trace mean that you reverted to before those changes and it then works?

> Rene is the best person to fix it if he's around.  I sent him a private
> email but go no response. So I'm a little bit in holding pattern on this.
> Apparently there are some loose ends with the stlport/serialization library
> combination that I would like to resolve.

Sorry about the delay it's busy around here ;-) See my reply to your 
first message for more.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq