[boost] Re: Is boost::fsm suitable for embedded systems?

From: Thomas Stevens (thomathoma69_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-30 13:37:28

Andreas Huber <ah2003 <at> gmx.net> writes:
> I think it is virtually impossible to write a non-trivial 
> library which incurs *no* overhead in all possible 
> applications. 

Yes, of course (I guess I expressed myself kinda sloppy).

> IMHO hard real-time requirements are pretty much orthogonal to 
> space/time requirements. 

Agreed. I believe I wanted to interprete and squeeze that requirement
to suit my needs...

> I very much believe that boost::fsm is suitable for many embedded 
> applications running in confined environments but there definitely 
> are applications for which the library is too heavy-weight. 

Ok, it is not just to drag in the boost::fsm then. I'll have to do a
detailed analyze of the application and its enviroment. 

Thanks,
/Thomas