Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: An alternative typeof macro

From: Peder Holt (peder.holt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-02 14:54:19

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:28:00 -0400, Arkadiy Vertleyb
<vertleyb_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> "Peder Holt" <peder.holt_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> 
> > My guess is that implementing a linked list, and searching for the
> > element at position N would require less compile time.
> 
> Why?
> 

Basically the same argument that Daniel had. Probably cheaper to build
than a vector, but since the lookup times are greater (at least for
the latter elements in the sequence) you will probably not gain much
anyway.

> Again, please keep in mind per-translation unit versus per-typeof invocation
> issue.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Arkadiy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>