From: Carlo Wood (carlo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-06 07:06:48
> While having streambuf_facade is DEFINITELY a good idea, I think you
> should have an "Advanced" section, where you talk about the streambufs.
> The rest of us are quite happy with having and using stream_facade.
I get the impression that most of the reviewers have
an objection against the uses of streams. The consensus seems
to be that the library should restrict itself to a (binary)
streambuf interface. Almost everyone has complained one way
or the other about the mixup of streams versus streambufs.
-- Carlo Wood <carlo_at_[hidden]>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk