Re: [boost] IOStreams formal review

From: Carlo Wood (carlo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-06 07:06:48

> While having streambuf_facade is DEFINITELY a good idea, I think you 
> should have an  "Advanced" section, where you talk about the streambufs. 
> The rest of us are quite happy with having and using stream_facade.

I get the impression that most of the reviewers have
an objection against the uses of streams.  The consensus seems
to be that the library should restrict itself to a (binary)
streambuf interface.  Almost everyone has complained one way
or the other about the mixup of streams versus streambufs.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo_at_[hidden]>