Re: [boost] typeless trampoline

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-07 10:31:27

From: Bronek Kozicki <brok_at_[hidden]>
> Rob Stewart wrote:
> 
> >>    static void exec(void * p)
>        ^^^^^^
> > Unfortunately, the type of exec is
> >    void (_lever_t<Function *>::*)(void *)
> > not
> >    void (*)(void *)
> > as you've declared _pf_t.  Thus, on any compiler that uses a
> > different function pointer type for pointers to member functions
> > and regular function pointers, will fail to compile this code.
> 
> No. exec is static member function. I'm pretty sure that its address can 
> be used to initialize regular function pointer, and that it's portable 
> and guaranteed by C++ standard. Futhermore, I'm quite sure that type you 
> mention is not applicable to static members of class.

You're entirely correct.  I glossed right over "static."

-- 
Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     http://www.sig.com
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;