From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-08 10:44:59
"tom brinkman" <reportbase_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| The current schedule allows ten days for each review.
| It has been brought to my attention that this is too aggressive.
| For the next couple of reviews, I will contact the library review managers
| to arrange new start dates to allow for longer review periods and to also
| ensure that they do not overlap. In my next status report, I will explain
| this change in the schedule and try to contact the remaining library
| authors for new start dates.
| My Concerns:
| 1) The review process is slow.
yeah, this is the problem.
I could accept review overlaps if it became the review managers job to
put together a group of people guaranteed to make a review. The size of
this group would depend on the library's size.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk