[boost] Re: [admin] Overlapping reviews -- should this be allowed?

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-08 10:44:59

"tom brinkman" <reportbase_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:chm2sp$bs9$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
| The current schedule allows ten days for each review.
| It has been brought to my attention that this is too aggressive.
| For the next couple of reviews, I will contact the library review managers
| to arrange new start dates to allow for longer review periods and to also
| ensure that they do not overlap.  In my next status report, I will explain
| this change in the schedule and try to contact the remaining library
| authors for new start dates.
|
| My Concerns:
| 1) The review process is slow.

yeah, this is the problem.

I could accept review overlaps if it became the review managers job to
put together a group of people guaranteed to make a review. The size of
this group would depend on the library's size.

br

Thorsten