[boost] Re: ublas iterator problem

From: Michael Stevens (Michael.Stevens_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-09 01:07:27

On Thursday 09 September 2004 05:42, David Abraham wrote:

> If these are (supposedly) random access iterators, it's because the
> ublas people aren't using iterator_facade or iterator_adaptor to
> define them.

I think you hit the nail on the head there! Making this change is number one 
on the priority list. The base classes to do this are already partially in 
place. Just a little work is required to change the rest of the code!

Michael

-- 
___________________________________
Michael Stevens Systems Engineering
Navigation Systems, Estimation  and
                 Bayesian Filtering
    http://bayesclasses.sf.net
___________________________________