From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-10 15:24:55
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>Don't you think it's time we generalized the hack into a nice macro
>>that generates the right code?
> I think so. In addition to prefix and postfix unary operators, there should be a
> binary version, too, right?
I have been toying with a more general solution to this problem, where
one can do things like:
check_dereference<T, is_convertible<mpl::_, U&> >
check_add<T, T, is_convertible<mpl::_, T> >
etc. I haven't used it anywhere yet, so I can't say if it's useful in
practice, but at least it was fun implementing. ;)
-- Daniel Wallin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk