From: Alex Chovanec (achovane_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-10 20:12:28
"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "Alex Chovanec" <achovane_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> The big question is--- if I should use them as concept-checks where
> are expected---
> how portable are they?
In theory, they should be just as portable as 'is_lvalue_iterator' and
'is_incrementable', since I have applied the same workarounds that those
More specifically, I have compiled my unit test and seen it pass under these
I think that I wrote a fairly comprehensive unit test, but if anyone else
can think of additional tests to add, I would appreciate it.
-- Alex Chovanec NIF and Engineering Division Computing Applications and Research Department Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk