[boost] Re: Re:Unabletobuildline_wrapping_output_filterwith_UNICODEdefined(was:IOStreamsformalreviewstart)

From: George M. Garner Jr. (gmgarner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-11 15:14:23

Johnathan,

> Could you be more specific? There are many places in the source where I 
> use
> static asserts to make sure character types match. <

I am referring to the six samples provided with the source, only five of 
which derive a class from input_filter or output filter.  Perhaps the better 
approach would be, in the samples, to derive from
filter<input, char> or filter<output, char> instead of input_filter or 
output_filter.  You could note in a comment that input_filter, 
input_wfilter, output_filter and output_wfilter are short hand for 
filter<input, char>, filter<input, __wchar_t>, filter<output, char> and 
filter<output, __wchar_t>, respectively.  One good sample is worth many 
pages of documentation.

Regards,

George.

P.S. Sorry about the subject line but at this point I have no idea of what 
it should be.