From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-13 09:56:34
David Abrahams wrote:
> Daniel Wallin <dalwan01_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>It's missing a simple way to somehow specialize for fundamental types..
> I don't understand why you'd want that. But maybe I don't understand
> what "that" is.
It's necessary to specialize the trait classes to handle fundamental
types, for instance:
Would trigger a compilation error otherwise.
-- Daniel Wallin