From: Sean Kelly (sean_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-13 12:40:04
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Carlo Wood wrote:
> You might be suprised - but I 100% agree with you :)
> Actually - I am only interested to code a *minimal* demultiplexor library.
> Unfortunately, it is probably not possible to give that library a
> portable interface without also dragging different types of 'devices'
> into it: a socket isn't a fifo (or else there are too many differences).
Why not just resume work on the Boost::Socket library? I can't remember
the link offhand, but IIRC the design was pretty solid and had hooks for
multiplexing as well as a nearly complete blocking i/o implementation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk