Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-14 09:24:19

Next message: Daniel James: "[boost] Re: typeof"
Previous message: Carlo Wood: "Re: [boost] Aaron's Informal Proposal for a Universal Demultiplexor for Boost"
In reply to: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] [type_traits] function_traits and functors"
Next in thread: Tobias Schwinger: "[boost] Re: [type_traits] function_traits and functors"

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> What is the reason that function_traits is not defined for function objects?
> Is it impossible?

For general function objects it is impossible, because they might have a
template operator().

Doug

Next message: Daniel James: "[boost] Re: typeof"
Previous message: Carlo Wood: "Re: [boost] Aaron's Informal Proposal for a Universal Demultiplexor for Boost"
In reply to: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] [type_traits] function_traits and functors"
Next in thread: Tobias Schwinger: "[boost] Re: [type_traits] function_traits and functors"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk